Search Decisions

Decision Text

AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01539
Original file (PD2013 01539.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved
RECORD OF PROCEEDINGS
PHYSICAL DISABILITY BOARD OF REVIEW

NAME: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX         CASE : PD13 0 1539
BRANCH OF SERVICE: Army   BOARD DATE: 201 4 0604
Separation Date: 20051130


SUMMARY OF CASE : Data extracted from the available evidence of record reflects that this covered individual (CI) was a National Guard MAJ/0-4 (43A/Personnel Management Officer) medically separated for a right ankle condition. She was issued a permanent L3/S1 profile and referred for a Medical Evaluation Board (MEB). The ankle condition, characterized as “traumatic arthritis, right ankle” with the following four conditions identified as secondary to the ankle, “joint pain, right ankle;” “joint pain in knees;” “joint pain in left hip;” and “low back pain;” was forwarded to the Physical Evaluation Board (PEB) IAW AR 40-501. The MEB also identified and forwarded five other conditions as meeting retention standards. The Informal PEB adjudicated “posttraumatic arthritis, right ankle, secondary to distal fibular fracture (Fx),”; “bilateral knee pain;” “left hip joint pain;” and “low back pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, 10%, 0%, and 0% respectively, with application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The PEB also adjudicated the other five conditions submitted by the MEB as not unfitting. The CI non-concurred and the Reconsideration PEB only adjudicated the “posttraumatic arthritis, right ankle…” as unfitting, rated 10%, identifying all other conditions as not unfitting. The CI non-concurred with the reconsideration PEB with a Formal PEB (FPEB) upholding the reconsideration PEB’s finding. The CI appealed the FPEB’s decision and it was upheld by the USAPDA. The CI was then separated.

invalid font number 31502
CI CONTENTION : The CI requests that we review her VA disability and Social Security disability ratings.


SCOPE OF REVIEW : The Board’s scope of review is defined in DoDI 6040.44, Enclosure 3, paragraph 5.e.(2). It is limited to those conditions determined by the PEB to be unfitting for continued military service and those conditions identified but not determined to be unfitting by the PEB when specifically requested by the CI. In addition, the CI was notified by the Army that her case may be eligible for review of the military disability evaluation of any mental health (MH) condition in accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of Service members who were referred to a disability evaluation process between 11 September 2001 and 30 April 2012 and whose MH diagnoses were changed or eliminated during that process. Since the CI responded to this mailing, it is presumed that she has elected review by the PDBR for the MH condition contended (none found). In accordance with Secretary of Defense directive for a comprehensive review of the MH diagnoses that were changed during the Disability Evaluation System (DES) process, the applicant’s case file was reviewed regarding diagnosis change, fitness determination, and rating of unfitting MH diagnoses in accordance with VASRD §4.129 and §4.130. The CI is also eligible for PDBR review of other conditions evaluated by the PEB and has elected review by the PDBR. The rating for the unfitting ankle condition is addressed below. Additionally, as the CI requested that we review her VA award, the following conditions found unfit by the PEB are also being reviewed by the Board: mild degenerative arthritis of the knees; joint pain in hip and mild spondylosis of lumbar spine. Any conditions or contention not requested in this application, or otherwise outside the Board’s defined scope of review, remain eligible for future consideration by the Board for Correction of Military Records.

invalid font number 31502 RATING COMPARISON invalid font number 31502 :

Service FPEB – Dated 20050929
 VA - (3 Mos. Pre-Separation)
Condition
 Code Rating Condition Code Rating Exam
Post-traumatic Arthritis, Right Ankle 5010 10% Right Distal Fibula Fx, s/p surgical correction 5262 30%* Service Treatment Record (STR)
Degenerative Arthritis of Knees Not Unfitting L Knee Strain Associated with Right Distal Fibular Fx 5260 10% 20050826
R Knee DJD w/ Chondromalacia Patella Associated w/ Right Distal Fibular Fx 5261 10% 20050826
Joint Pain in Left Hip Not Unfitting Post-traumatic Arthritis, Left Hip, Associated with Right Distal Fibular Fx 5252 10% 20050826
Mild Spondylosis of Lumbar Spine Not Unfitting Lumbar Spine Strain Associated with Right Distal Fibular Fx 5237 20% 20050826
Other x2 (Not in Scope)
 Other x 4
Combined: 10%
 Combined: 70%
Derived from VA Rating Decisions (VARDs) dated 20041029 and 20060112. *20041029 VARD rated the 5262 at 100% (surgery) and then 10%, increased to 30% by 20060112 VARD, effective 20040107. VARD of 20060112 added the last four conditions, effective 20050706. No VA exams were quoted as evidence by the 20041029 VARD.


ANALYSIS SUMMARY : IAW DoDI 6040.44, the Board’s authority is limited to making recommendations on correcting disability determinations. The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation; and, to review those fitness determinations within its scope (as elaborated above) consistent with performance-based criteria in evidence at separation.

Right Ankle Condition . The CI sustained a right ankle fracture while descending an icy mountain trai l during a field training exercise on 8 February 2004. She was helicoptered to a civilian hospital and underwent surgical fixation of the ankle fracture . The CI underwent extensive p hysical t herapy for range - of - motion ( ROM ) and strengthening. The o rthopedist noted that the CI still had pain and stiffness along the posterior tibia and tenderness over the anterior tibia-fibula line and bottom of foot . The initial VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 11 months prior to separation docume nted that the CI complained of pain in the right ankle, tight ligaments, numbness on the bottom of the foot, stiffness , swelling and instability. The C&P exam findings are summarized in the chart below . An o rthopedic follow-up appointment in May 2005 , noted that the CI continued with an antalgic gait, significant restriction of motion and an inability to rise onto her toes and tenderness to palpation over the ankle . The CI was given a cane to assist with ambulation. The c ommander’s s tatement noted that the CI’s right ankle fracture along with her residual knee, hip and back pain prevented her from being fit to deploy and unable to perform her MOS duties. The initial MEB n arrative s ummary (NARSUM) exam approximately 5 months prior to separation documented constant right ankle pain, swelling and stiffness , precipitated by walking or standing and worse ned with activity. The MEB NARSUM exam findings are summarized in the chart above. The CI was given a permanent L3 p rofile for ankle arthritis-post fracture and other medical conditions . The second VA C&P exam approximately 3 months prior to separation documented that the CI needed to wear an ankle brace and use a cane for ambulation. She reported numbness , paresthesias, stabbing achy pain in the right foot. No ankle ROM’s were done at this exam. The CI was seen by o rthopedics in May, July and October and each examiner documented that the CI reported worsening of the right ankle pain with significant tenderness to palpation along the lateral malleolar plate, medial malleolus and dorsum of the foot. The examiner reviewed a right ankle X - ray from 15 December 2004 which showed no evidence of non-union or malunion. An a ddendum to the MEB NARSUM exam approximately 2 months prior to separation , documented that the CI had incapacitating pain which prevented her from performing her activities of daily living. The MEB NARSUM a ddendum exam findings are summarized in the chart below .
There were three ROM evaluations in evidence, with documentation of additional ratable criteria, which the Board weighed in arriving at its rating recommendation; as summarized in the following chart :

Right Ankle ROM (Degrees)
 VA C&P 11 .5 Mo s . Pre-Sep MEB 5. 5 Mo s . Pre-Sep MEB Addendum 2 Mo s . Pre-Sep
Dorsiflexion (20 Normal)
 5 5 0
Plantar Flexion (45)
 10 20 30
Comment
 Guarded gait; Pos. tenderness to palpation; Pos. edema & painful motion; Pos. weakness unable to walk using full weight on right foot; Antalgic gait; Pos. swelling & tenderness to palpation; Minimal thigh & calf atrophy; Pos. crepitus; No instability, Pos. hyperesthesia bottom of foot Pt. reports “Pain is i ncapacitating ”
5271
 20% 20% 20%
invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 The Board directs attention to its rating recommendation based on the above evidence. invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The PEB coded invalid font number 31502 the invalid font number 31502 post-traumatic arthritis, right ankle invalid font number 31502 condition invalid font number 31502 as 5010 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 a invalid font number 31502 rthritis due to trauma invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 and rated at 10% invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 for “loss of ankle motion.” invalid font number 31502 The VA coded the invalid font number 31502 r invalid font number 31502 ight invalid font number 31502 d invalid font number 31502 istal invalid font number 31502 f invalid font number 31502 ibula, invalid font number 31502 F invalid font number 31502 x invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 condition as 5262 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 impairment of t invalid font number 31502 ibia and fibula invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 and rated at 30% consistent with m invalid font number 31502 alunion invalid font number 31502 w invalid font number 31502 ith marked ankle disability. The VA initially rated the right ankle condition at 10% invalid font number 31502 ; invalid font number 31502 however invalid font number 31502 , invalid font number 31502 the VARD invalid font number 31502 on 11 February invalid font number 31502 200 invalid font number 31502 5 invalid font number 31502 increased the rating to 30% effective invalid font number 31502 on 7 January invalid font number 31502 2004 invalid font number 31502 after review by a Decision Rating Officer citing “ invalid font number 31502 … invalid font number 31502 rat invalid font number 31502 ed invalid font number 31502 under code 5284, other foot injuries with severe symptoms.” invalid font number 31502 In September 2005, the invalid font number 31502 o invalid font number 31502 rthopedist reviewed invalid font number 31502 a right ankle X invalid font number 31502 - invalid font number 31502 ray from 15 invalid font number 31502   invalid font number 31502 December 2004 and documented no evidence of non-union or malunion. invalid font number 31502 All exams proximate to separation documented limited dorsiflexion and plantar flexion invalid font number 31502 and required invalid font number 31502 the use of a invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 brace and cane for ambulation. The Board reviewed the rating criteria invalid font number 31502 of 5271 invalid font number 31502 ( invalid font number 31502 limited motion of the a invalid font number 31502 nkle invalid font number 31502 ) invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 and invalid font number 31502 determi invalid font number 31502 ned that this coding more closely invalid font number 31502 described the right ankle condition invalid font number 31502 ; the CI had an ankle injury with surgical repair of the ankle, as compared to the VA’s use of a foot code for rating. invalid font number 31502 After due deliberation, considering all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt), the Board recommends a disability rating of 20% for the invalid font number 31502 right ankle p invalid font number 31502 ost invalid font number 31502 - invalid font number 31502 traumatic invalid font number 31502 a invalid font number 31502 rthritis invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 status post invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 open reduction and internal fixation invalid font number 31502 condition coded 5271. invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502
Contended PEB Conditions. The contended conditions adjudicated as not unfitting by the F PEB and upheld by the USAPDA were bilateral knee pain, joint pain in left hip and mild spondylosis of lumbar spine . The Board’s first charge with respect to these conditions is an assessment of the appropriateness of the F PEB’s fitness adjudications. The Board’s threshold for countering fitness determinations is higher than the VASRD §4.3 (reasonable doubt) standard used for its rating recommendations and requires a preponderance of evidence.

Bilateral Knee Pain , Left Hip Joint Pain and Low Back Pain Contended Condition s . A causality linkage of the bilateral knee pain , left hip joint pain and low back pain condition s with the unfitting right ankle post-traumatic arthritis condition, even if conceded, is not a basis in itself for s ervice disability rating. C oncurrent condition s of this nature must them sel ves be separately unfitting to merit additional rating. The evidence contained two profiles signed by the same individuals and dated the same day, one identified only the right ankle condition while the other identified the bilateral knee , left hip and low back pain condition s . The MEB physical exam (DD Form 2808) documented a diagnosis of low back p ain but d id not contain a diagnosis of a ny knee or hip condition. The c ommander’s statement mentioned “ … residual knee , hip and back pain due to her abnormal gait from her ankle injury.” The Board did not find any evidence of an evaluation or treatment of a knee , hip or low back condition in the STR . All entries were reviewed by the action officer and considered by the Board. There was no performance based evidence from the record that the bilateral knee , left hip or low back condition s significantly interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was insufficient cause to recommend a change in the F PEB fitness determination for the bilateral knee , left hip and low back contended condition s and so no additional disability ratings are recommended.

Mental Health Contended Condition : The Board reviewed the records for evidence of changes or elimination of a MH diagnosis during processing through the military DES and determined that no MH condition was entered into the DES. This applicant therefore did not meet the inclusion criteria in the Terms of Reference of the MH Review Project. The evidence was reviewed and the Board noted that the MEB physical exam documented a diagnosis of depression and the CI completed MEB history form (DD Form 2807 ) reflected complaints of depression. No MH condition was identified on any physical profile or by the c ommander’s statement. There were no entries in the STRs that reflect evaluation or treatment for a ny MH condition. There was no performance based evidence from the record that any MH condition interfered with satisfactory duty performance. After due deliberation in consideration of the preponderance of the evidence, the Board concluded that there was no unfitting MH condition existed so no additional disability rating is recommended.


BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military Department regulations or guidelines relied upon by the PEB will not be considered by the Board to the extent they were inconsistent with the VASRD in effect at the time of the adjudication. As discussed above, PEB reliance on the USAPDA pain policy ( 635-40) and the VASRD for rating the left hip joint pain condition was operant in this case and the condition was adjudicated independently of that policy by the Board. In the matter of the post-traumatic arthritis, right ankle, secondary to distal fibular fracture condition, the Board unanimously recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5271 IAW VASRD §4.71a. In the matter of the contended bilateral knee pain condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the F PEB determination as not unfitting. In the matter of the contended joint pain left hip condition, the Board unanimously recommends no change from the FPEB determination as not unfitting. In the matter of the contended low back pain condition , the Board unanimously recommends no change from the FPEB determination as not unfitting. In the matter of the contended MH condition, the Board unanimously recommends no unfitting mental Health condition existed so no disability rating is recommended. There were no other conditions within the Board’s scope of review for consideration.

invalid font number 31502
invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION invalid font number 31502 : invalid font number 31502 invalid font number 31502 The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows, effective as of the date of her prior medical separation: invalid font number 31502

UNFITTING CONDITION
 VASRD CODE RATING
Post - traumatic Arthritis, R ight Ankle 5271 2 0%
Bilateral Knee Pain Condition Not Unfitting
Joint Pain in Left Hip Not Unfitting
Low Back Pain Not Unfitting
COMBINED
 2 0 %
invalid font number 31502

invalid font number 31502


The following documentary evidence was considered:
Exhibit A. DD Form 294, dated 20 130913 , w/atchs
Exhib it B. Service Treatment Record
Exhibit C. Department of Veterans ’ Affairs Treatment Record


                          
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
President
Physical Disability Board of Review

SAMR-RB                                                                         


MEMORANDUM FOR Commander, US Army Physical Disability Agency
(AHRC-DO), 2900 Crystal Drive, Suite 300, Arlington, VA 22202-3557


 SUBJECT: Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review Recommendation
for XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX , AR20140015241 (PD201301539)
1. I have reviewed the enclosed Department of Defense Physical Disability Board of Review (DoD PDBR) recommendation and record of proceedings pertaining to the subject individual. Under the authority of Title 10, United States Code, section 1554a, I accept the Board’s recommendation to modify the individual’s disability rating to 20% without recharacterization of the individual’s separation. This decision is final.

2. I direct that all the Department of the Army records of the individual concerned be corrected accordingly no later than 120 days from the date of this memorandum.

3. I request that a copy of the corrections and any related correspondence be provided to the individual concerned, counsel (if any), any Members of Congress who have shown interest, and to the Army Review Boards Agency with a copy of this memorandum without enclosures.

BY ORDER OF THE SECRETARY OF THE ARMY:



Encl                                                  XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
                                                      Deputy Assistant Secretary
                                                      (Army Review Boards)

CF:
( ) DoD PDBR
( ) DVA

Similar Decisions

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01246

    Original file (PD2013 01246.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated “right, dominant, shoulder pain… ,” “right hip pain,” and “bilateral heel pain and right ankle pain” as unfitting, rated 10%, 0% and 0% (respectively), citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Post-Separation)ConditionCodeRatingConditionCodeRatingExam Right Shoulder Pain…5099-500310%Right Shoulder Arthritis5010-520110%20091125Right Hip Pain…5099-50030%Right Hip Bursitis5024-525210%Bilateral Heel Pain and Right Ankle Pain…52840%Stress Fracture,...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD2012 01746

    Original file (PD2012 01746.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    This evidence supports a determination of moderate disability.After due deliberation in consideration of all of the evidence and mindful of VASRD §4.3 (Reasonable doubt), the Board concluded that left tibial FX with residual weakness of the left ankle requiring an AFO and a cane for ambulation condition was separately unfitting and recommends a disability rating of 20%, coded 5262 IAW VASRD §4.71a. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 00826

    Original file (PD2013 00826.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board reviews medical records and other available evidence to assess the fairness of PEB rating determinations, using the VASRD standards, based on ratable severity at the time of separation. Contended PEB Conditions : The Board noted that no MH condition was referred into the DES. invalid font number 31502 RECOMMENDATION : The Board, therefore, recommends that there be no recharacterization of the CI’s disability and separation determination, as follows:

  • AF | PDBR | CY2011 | PD2011 01093

    Original file (PD2011 01093.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    An administratively corrected PEB adjudicated “ chronic bilateral hip pain with a history of acetabular fractures” as unfitting, rated 10% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy, the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD), and compensability under 10 USC § 1207a. Bilateral Hip Pain Condition . The decision review officer VARD in August 2004 determined the left hip condition was service-connected and rated the left hip...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01511

    Original file (PD-2013-01511.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD) standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. Right Femoral Shaft Stress Fracture Condition . The diagnoses were listed asright femoral shaft stress fracture; bilateral medial tibial plateau stress reactions; right second metatarsal stress reaction; and bilateral...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD2013 01713

    Original file (PD2013 01713.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The PEB adjudicated “chronic low back pain (LBP) status post (s/p) L5/S1 fusion” as unfitting, rated 10%, citing criteria of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). Should the Board judge that a condition was most likely incompatible with the specific duty requirements, a disability rating IAW the VASRD, based on the degree of disability evidenced at separation, will be recommended. invalid font number 31502 ” The CI had chronic LBP and ROM flexion limited to 80 degrees at the MEB exam.

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-02688

    Original file (PD-2013-02688.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The Informal PEB (IPEB)adjudicated the chronic bilateral knee pain as unfitting, rated 10%, citing application of the Veterans Affairs Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The Board’s assessment of the PEB rating determinations is confined to review of medical records and all available evidence for application of the VASRD standards to the unfitting medical condition at the time of separation. invalid font number 31502 BOARD FINDINGS : IAW DoDI 6040.44, provisions of DoD or Military...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD-2013-01204

    Original file (PD-2013-01204.rtf) Auto-classification: Denied

    The record contains well documented evidence of significant left thigh muscle injury with an open, comminuted femur fracture that required ORIF and subsequent bone grafting. RECOMMENDATION : The Board recommends that the CI’s prior determination be modified as follows; and, that the discharge with severance pay be recharacterized to reflect permanent disability retirement, effective as of the date of his prior medical separation: DoD Physical Disability Board of Review

  • AF | PDBR | CY2013 | PD 2013 01186

    Original file (PD 2013 01186.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    Additionally, members agreed that the chronic low back pain and left shoulder pain conditions, as isolated conditions, would have rendered the CI incapable of continued service within his MOS and therefore each is separately unfitting and merits a separate rating. Physical Disability Board of Review Providing a correction to the individual’s separation document showing that the individual was separated by reason of permanent disability retirement effective the date of the original medical...

  • AF | PDBR | CY2012 | PD 2012 00953

    Original file (PD 2012 00953.rtf) Auto-classification: Approved

    The PEB adjudicated bilateral anterior knee pain syndrome as unfitting, rated 0% with likely application of the US Army Physical Disability Agency (USAPDA) pain policy and recurrent stress fracture of right tibia as unfitting, rated 0% with application of the VA Schedule for Rating Disabilities (VASRD). The MEB examiner referred to the exam results documented on the MEB DD Form 2808 which are summarized in the chart above.The VA Compensation and Pension (C&P) exam approximately 8 days prior...